[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16006679#comment-16006679
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4022:
---------------------------------------

Github user aljoscha commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3746#discussion_r115997026
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kafka-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kafka/internals/AbstractFetcher.java
 ---
    @@ -106,31 +139,69 @@ protected AbstractFetcher(
                        }
                }
     
    -           // create our partition state according to the 
timestamp/watermark mode 
    -           this.subscribedPartitionStates = 
initializeSubscribedPartitionStates(
    -                           assignedPartitionsWithInitialOffsets,
    +           this.unassignedPartitionsQueue = new ClosableBlockingQueue<>();
    +
    +           // initialize subscribed partition states with seed partitions
    +           this.subscribedPartitionStates = createPartitionStateHolders(
    +                           seedPartitionsWithInitialOffsets,
                                timestampWatermarkMode,
    -                           watermarksPeriodic, watermarksPunctuated,
    +                           watermarksPeriodic,
    +                           watermarksPunctuated,
                                userCodeClassLoader);
     
    -           // check that all partition states have a defined offset
    +           // check that all seed partition states have a defined offset
                for (KafkaTopicPartitionState partitionState : 
subscribedPartitionStates) {
    --- End diff --
    
    Could add generic parameter, but is already existing code.


> Partition discovery / regex topic subscription for the Kafka consumer
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-4022
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4022
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Kafka Connector, Streaming Connectors
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>            Assignee: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> Example: allow users to subscribe to "topic-n*", so that the consumer 
> automatically reads from "topic-n1", "topic-n2", ... and so on as they are 
> added to Kafka.
> I propose to implement this feature by the following description:
> Since the overall list of partitions to read will change after job 
> submission, the main big change required for this feature will be dynamic 
> partition assignment to subtasks while the Kafka consumer is running. This 
> will mainly be accomplished using Kafka 0.9.x API 
> `KafkaConsumer#subscribe(java.util.regex.Pattern, 
> ConsumerRebalanceListener)`. Each KafkaConsumers in each subtask will be 
> added to the same consumer group when instantiated, and rely on Kafka to 
> dynamically reassign partitions to them whenever a rebalance happens. The 
> registered `ConsumerRebalanceListener` is a callback that is called right 
> before and after rebalancing happens. We'll use this callback to let each 
> subtask commit its last offsets of partitions its currently responsible of to 
> an external store (or Kafka) before a rebalance; after rebalance and the 
> substasks gets the new partitions it'll be reading from, they'll read from 
> the external store to get the last offsets for their new partitions 
> (partitions which don't have offset entries in the store are new partitions 
> causing the rebalancing).
> The tricky part will be restoring Flink checkpoints when the partition 
> assignment is dynamic. Snapshotting will remain the same - subtasks snapshot 
> the offsets of partitions they are currently holding. Restoring will be  a 
> bit different in that subtasks might not be assigned matching partitions to 
> the snapshot the subtask is restored with (since we're letting Kafka 
> dynamically assign partitions). There will need to be a coordination process 
> where, if a restore state exists, all subtasks first commit the offsets they 
> receive (as a result of the restore state) to the external store, and then 
> all subtasks attempt to find a last offset for the partitions it is holding.
> However, if the globally merged restore state feature mentioned by 
> [~StephanEwen] in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3231 is 
> available, then the restore will be simple again, as each subtask has full 
> access to previous global state therefore coordination is not required.
> I think changing to dynamic partition assignment is also good in the long run 
> for handling topic repartitioning.
> Overall,
> User-facing API changes:
> - New constructor - FlinkKafkaConsumer09(java.util.regex.Pattern, 
> DeserializationSchema, Properties)
> - New constructor - FlinkKafkaConsumer09(java.util.regex.Pattern,
> KeyedDeserializationSchema, Properties)
> Implementation changes:
> 1. Dynamic partition assigning depending on KafkaConsumer#subscribe
> - Remove partition list querying from constructor
> - Remove static partition assigning to substasks in run()
> - Instead of using KafkaConsumer#assign() in fetchers to manually assign 
> static partitions, use subscribe() registered with the callback 
> implementation explained above.
> 2. Restoring from checkpointed states
> - Snapshotting should remain unchanged
> - Restoring requires subtasks to coordinate the restored offsets they hold 
> before continuing (unless we are able to have merged restore states).
> 3. For previous consumer functionality (consume from fixed list of topics), 
> the KafkaConsumer#subscribe() has a corresponding overload method for fixed 
> list of topics. We can simply decide which subscribe() overload to use 
> depending on whether a regex Pattern or list of topics is supplied.
> 4. If subtasks don't initially have any assigned partitions, we shouldn't 
> emit MAX_VALUE watermark, since it may hold partitions after a rebalance. 
> Instead, un-assigned subtasks should be running a fetcher instance too and 
> take part as a process pool for the consumer group of the subscribed topics.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to