[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14573280#comment-14573280
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2080:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user rmetzger opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/787

    [FLINK-2080] Document how to use Flink with sbt

    I've turned the patch from FLINK-2080 into a pull request ;)

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/rmetzger/flink flink2080

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/787.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #787
    
----
commit e909c18618936eacd20f51466863216279130288
Author: Christian Wuerz <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-06-04T18:05:46Z

    [FLINK-2080] Document how to use Flink with sbt

----


> Execute Flink with sbt
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-2080
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2080
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.1
>            Reporter: Christian Wuertz
>            Assignee: Christian Wuertz
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: sbt.patch
>
>
> I tried to execute some of the flink example applications on my local machine 
> using sbt. To get this running without class loading issues it was important 
> to make sure that Flink is executed in its own JVM and not in the sbt JVM. 
> This can be done very easily, but it would have been nice to know that in 
> advance. So maybe you guys want to add this to the Flink documentation.
> An example can be found here: https://github.com/Teots/flink-sbt
> (The trick was to add "fork in run := true" to the build.sbt)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to