Github user dawidwys commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4418#discussion_r130818022
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-cep/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/cep/operator/CEPOperatorTest.java
---
@@ -923,6 +934,126 @@ public boolean filter(Event value) throws Exception {
}
}
+ @Test
+ public void testCEPOperatorComparatorProcessTime() throws Exception {
+ Event startEvent1 = new Event(42, "start", 1.0);
+ Event startEvent2 = new Event(42, "start", 2.0);
+ SubEvent middleEvent1 = new SubEvent(42, "foo1", 3.0, 10.0);
+ SubEvent middleEvent2 = new SubEvent(42, "foo2", 4.0, 10.0);
+ Event endEvent1 = new Event(42, "end", 1.0);
+
+ Event startEventK2 = new Event(43, "start", 1.0);
+
+ KeyedCEPPatternOperator<Event, Integer> operator =
getKeyedCepOpearatorWithComparator(true);
+ OneInputStreamOperatorTestHarness<Event, Map<String,
List<Event>>> harness = getCepTestHarness(operator);
+
+ try {
+ harness.open();
+
+ harness.setProcessingTime(0L);
+
+ harness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(startEvent1,
1L));
--- End diff --
Could you update the timestamps to the `0L`(the corresponding processing
time)? I know it does not matter in `ProcessingTime`, but I think it will be
easier to read that way. What do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
