Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4789#discussion_r143731232
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/rest/messages/job/savepoints/SavepointTriggerHeaders.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.flink.runtime.rest.messages.job.savepoints;
    +
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.rest.HttpMethodWrapper;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.rest.messages.EmptyRequestBody;
    +import org.apache.flink.runtime.rest.messages.MessageHeaders;
    +
    +import 
org.apache.flink.shaded.netty4.io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpResponseStatus;
    +
    +/**
    + * These headers define the protocol for triggering a savepoint.
    + */
    +public class SavepointTriggerHeaders implements 
MessageHeaders<EmptyRequestBody, SavepointTriggerResponseBody, 
SavepointMessageParameters> {
    +
    +   private static final SavepointTriggerHeaders INSTANCE = new 
SavepointTriggerHeaders();
    +
    +   private SavepointTriggerHeaders() {
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public Class<EmptyRequestBody> getRequestClass() {
    +           return EmptyRequestBody.class;
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public Class<SavepointTriggerResponseBody> getResponseClass() {
    +           return SavepointTriggerResponseBody.class;
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public HttpResponseStatus getResponseStatusCode() {
    +           return HttpResponseStatus.ACCEPTED;
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public SavepointMessageParameters getUnresolvedMessageParameters() {
    +           return new SavepointMessageParameters();
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public HttpMethodWrapper getHttpMethod() {
    +           return HttpMethodWrapper.POST;
    +   }
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public String getTargetRestEndpointURL() {
    +           /*
    +           Note: this is different to the existing implementation for 
which the targetDirectory is a path parameter
    +           Having it as a path parameter has several downsides as it
    +                   - is optional (which we only allow for query parameters)
    +                   - causes parsing issues, since the path is not reliably 
treated as a single parameter
    +                   - does not denote a hierarchy which path parameters are 
supposed to do
    +                   - interacts badly with the POST spec, as it would 
require the progress url to also contain the targetDirectory
    +            */
    --- End diff --
    
    Good thing to change the old behaviour!


---

Reply via email to