[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16212511#comment-16212511
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7755:
---------------------------------------

Github user xccui commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4858#discussion_r145863086
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/plan/nodes/logical/FlinkLogicalJoin.scala
 ---
    @@ -97,8 +97,7 @@ private class FlinkLogicalJoinConverter
     
       private def hasEqualityPredicates(join: LogicalJoin, joinInfo: 
JoinInfo): Boolean = {
    --- End diff --
    
    The parameter `join` seems to be useless now.


> Null values are not correctly handled by batch inner and outer joins
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-7755
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7755
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.3.2
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>            Assignee: Fabian Hueske
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.4.0, 1.3.3
>
>
> Join predicates of batch joins are not correctly evaluated according to 
> three-value logic.
> This affects inner as well as outer joins.
> The problem is that some equality predicates are only evaluated by the 
> internal join algorithms of Flink which are based on {{TypeComparator}}. The 
> field {{TypeComparator}} for {{Row}} are implemented such that {{null == 
> null}} results in {{TRUE}} to ensure correct ordering and grouping. However, 
> three-value logic requires that {{null == null}} results to {{UNKNOWN}} (or 
> null). The code generator implements this logic correctly, but for equality 
> predicates, no code is generated.
> For outer joins, the problem is a bit tricker because these do not support 
> code-generated predicates yet (see FLINK-5520). FLINK-5498 proposes a 
> solution for this issue.
> We also need to extend several of the existing tests and add null values to 
> ensure that the join logic is correctly implemented. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to