[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16236173#comment-16236173
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6434:
---------------------------------------
Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4937#discussion_r148592528
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/instance/SlotPool.java ---
@@ -361,9 +374,19 @@ private void
slotRequestToResourceManagerFailed(AllocationID allocationID, Throw
}
private void checkTimeoutSlotAllocation(AllocationID allocationID) {
+ removePendingRequestWithException(allocationID, new
TimeoutException("Slot allocation request " + allocationID + " timed out"));
+ }
+
+ private void removePendingRequestWithException(AllocationID
allocationID, Exception e) {
--- End diff --
maybe we could refactor this method into
`failPendingRequest(PendingRequest, Exception)`, then it could be used by
`checkTimeoutSlotAllocation` and `checkTimeoutRequestWaitingForResourceManager`
> There may be allocatedSlots leak in SlotPool
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-6434
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6434
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Cluster Management
> Reporter: shuai.xu
> Assignee: shuai.xu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: flip-6
>
> If the call allocateSlot() from Execution to Slotpool timeout, the job will
> begin to failover, but the pending request are still in SlotPool, if then a
> new slot register to SlotPool, it may be fulfill the outdated pending request
> and be added to allocatedSlots, but it will never be used and will never be
> recycled.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
