[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16237447#comment-16237447
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7870:
---------------------------------------
Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4887#discussion_r148754465
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/resourcemanager/slotmanager/SlotManager.java
---
@@ -302,7 +302,12 @@ public boolean unregisterSlotRequest(AllocationID
allocationId) {
PendingSlotRequest pendingSlotRequest =
pendingSlotRequests.remove(allocationId);
if (null != pendingSlotRequest) {
- cancelPendingSlotRequest(pendingSlotRequest);
+ if (pendingSlotRequest.isAssigned()) {
+ cancelPendingSlotRequest(pendingSlotRequest);
+ }
+ else {
+
resourceActions.cancelResourceAllocation(pendingSlotRequest.getResourceProfile());
--- End diff --
Then this should be added as a separate feature because it is not strictly
required by this PR here.
Furthermore, I'm not sure whether this shouldn't be the responsibility of
the `ResourceManager`. E.g. we could think about adding a timeout for container
requests after which we cancel them. Additionally, if we add support for
starting machines with multiple slots, then we shouldn't release a requested
resource if only a single of it slots is no longer needed. That is something
else to consider before adding the cancel resource allocation method.
> SlotPool should cancel the slot request to RM if not need any more.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-7870
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7870
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Cluster Management
> Reporter: shuai.xu
> Assignee: shuai.xu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: flip-6
>
> 1. SlotPool will request slot to rm if its slots are not enough.
> 2. If a slot request is not fulfilled in a certain time, SlotPool will treat
> the request as timeout and send a new slot request by triggering a failover
> in JobMaster, the previous request is not needed any more, but rm does not
> know it.
> 3. This may cause the rm request much more resource than the job really need.
> For example:
> 1. A job need 100 slots. RM request 100 container to YARN.
> 2. But YARN is busy now, it has no resource for the job.
> 3. The job failover as the resource request not fulfilled in time.
> 4. It ask 100 slots again, now RM request 200 container to YARN.
> 5. If failover server time, the containers request will become more and more.
> 6. Now YARN has resource, it will find that the job may need thousands of
> containers. This is a waste of resources.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
