[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16265076#comment-16265076
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7959:
---------------------------------------

Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4940#discussion_r152919537
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/api/TableEnvironment.scala
 ---
    @@ -1002,11 +999,13 @@ abstract class TableEnvironment(val config: 
TableConfig) {
              |return ${conversion.resultTerm};
              |""".stripMargin
     
    -    val generated = generator.generateFunction(
    +    val generated = FunctionCodeGenerator.generateFunction(
    +      ctx,
           functionName,
           classOf[MapFunction[Row, OUT]],
           body,
    -      requestedTypeInfo)
    +      requestedTypeInfo,
    +      inputTypeInfo)
    --- End diff --
    
    If both function code generator and expression code generator need 
information about the inputs, wouldn't it make sense to bind the inputs to the 
code generator context? Instead of defining the same inputs twice.


> Split CodeGenerator into CodeGeneratorContext and ExprCodeGenerator
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-7959
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7959
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: Kurt Young
>            Assignee: Kurt Young
>
> Right now {{CodeGenerator}} actually acts two roles, one is responsible for 
> generating codes from RexNode, and the other one is keeping lots of reusable 
> statements. It makes more sense to split these logic into two dedicated 
> classes. 
> The new {{CodeGeneratorContext}} will keep all the reusable statements, while 
> the new {{ExprCodeGenerator}} will only do generating codes from RexNode.
> And for classes like {{AggregationCodeGenerator}} or 
> {{FunctionCodeGenerator}}, I think the should not be the subclasses of the 
> {{CodeGenerator}}, but should all as standalone classes. They can create 
> {{ExprCodeGenerator}} when they need to generating codes from RexNode, and 
> they can also generating codes by themselves. The {{CodeGeneratorContext}} 
> can be passed around to collect all reusable statements, and list them in the 
> final generated class.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to