[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16274480#comment-16274480
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8181:
---------------------------------------
Github user aljoscha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5108#discussion_r154363505
--- Diff:
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kafka-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kafka/partitioner/FlinkFixedPartitioner.java
---
@@ -68,6 +78,13 @@ public int partition(T record, byte[] key, byte[] value,
String targetTopic, int
partitions != null && partitions.length > 0,
"Partitions of the target topic is empty.");
- return partitions[parallelInstanceId % partitions.length];
+ if (topicToFixedPartition.containsKey(targetTopic)) {
--- End diff --
Maybe yes, but I don't think we can do it this quickly now. Adding stateful
stuff has big implications and we should make sure to understand them all.
> Kafka producer's FlinkFixedPartitioner returns different partitions when a
> target topic is rescaled
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-8181
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8181
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Kafka Connector
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.5.0
> Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> Assignee: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.4.0, 1.5.0
>
>
> On fixing FLINK-6288 and migrating the original {{FlinkFixedPartitioner}} to
> the new partitioning API (commit 9ed9b68397b51bfd2b0f6e532212a82f771641bd),
> the {{FlinkFixedPartitioner}} no longer returns identical target partitions
> once a target topic is rescaled.
> This results in a behavioral regression when the {{FlinkFixedPartitioner}} is
> used.
> The {{FlinkFixedPartitionerTest}} should also be strengthened to cover the
> target topic rescaling case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
