Github user tzulitai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5124
The PR has correct identification of what should be public and what is
internal, IMO.
However, as I also explained in #5138, I think we should not go with the
`@Public` annotation now, and only `@PublicEvolving`. The intention of
FLINK-8199 focuses only on separating internal and public APIs. Whether or not
we want to guarantee supporting a public API can be discussed separately.
@zhangminglei can you change all `@Public` annotations in the PR to
`@PublicEvolving`?
---
