[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14605634#comment-14605634
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2138:
---------------------------------------
Github user gaborhermann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/872#issuecomment-116671285
I'd prefer the function implementation (like `(K, Int) => Int`), but it
should stay consistent with the batch API. I don't see why the wrapping would
effect the compatibility checking of the partitioning.
Is it okay, if I change it to the function implementation in both (Scala
batch, Scala streaming) APIs? If not, then let's just stick with the
partitioner implementation in the APIs.
> PartitionCustom for streaming
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-2138
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2138
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Streaming
> Affects Versions: 0.9
> Reporter: Márton Balassi
> Assignee: Gábor Hermann
> Priority: Minor
>
> The batch API has support for custom partitioning, this should be added for
> streaming with a similar signature.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
