[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319761#comment-16319761 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8306: --------------------------------------- Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5200#discussion_r160598772 --- Diff: flink-connectors/flink-connector-kafka-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kafka/internals/AbstractFetcher.java --- @@ -51,7 +50,7 @@ * the Flink data streams. * @param <KPH> The type of topic/partition identifier used by Kafka in the specific version. */ -public abstract class AbstractFetcher<T, KPH> { +public abstract class AbstractFetcher<T, KPH> implements KafkaOffsetCommitter { --- End diff -- I agree that composition suits better here, or maybe even neither of both. However, the reality is that currently the offset committing logic is implemented tightly as part of the `AbstractFetcher`, sharing the same Kafka client for both fetching records and committing offsets. Decoupling that would require further refactoring, which I think is a bit out of scope for the current issue at hand. I have been thinking that we should simply have two separate service implementations for offset committing and record fetching. If that happens, then neither composition or inheritance is required; offset committing and record fetching simply lives as two separate services. What do you think? > FlinkKafkaConsumerBaseTest has invalid mocks on final methods > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-8306 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8306 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Kafka Connector, Tests > Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai > Assignee: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 1.5.0, 1.4.1 > > > The {{FlinkKafkaConsumerBaseTest}} has invalid mocks on a final > {{AbstractFetcher::commitInternalOffsetsToKafka(...)}} method. While an easy > fix would be to simply make that method non-final, that is not ideal since it > would be best that the method is left final to prevent overrides in > subclasses. > This suggests that offset committing functionality is too tightly coupled > with the {{AbstractFetcher}}, making it hard to perform concise tests to > verify offset committing. > I suggest that we decouple record fetching and offset committing as separate > services behind different interfaces. We should introduce a new interface, > say {{KafkaOffsetCommitter}}, and test against that instead. Initially, we > can simply let {{AbstractFetcher}} implement {{KafkaOffsetCommitter}}. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)