[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16319761#comment-16319761
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8306:
---------------------------------------
Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5200#discussion_r160598772
--- Diff:
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kafka-base/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kafka/internals/AbstractFetcher.java
---
@@ -51,7 +50,7 @@
* the Flink data streams.
* @param <KPH> The type of topic/partition identifier used by Kafka in
the specific version.
*/
-public abstract class AbstractFetcher<T, KPH> {
+public abstract class AbstractFetcher<T, KPH> implements
KafkaOffsetCommitter {
--- End diff --
I agree that composition suits better here, or maybe even neither of both.
However, the reality is that currently the offset committing logic is
implemented tightly as part of the `AbstractFetcher`, sharing the same Kafka
client for both fetching records and committing offsets. Decoupling that would
require further refactoring, which I think is a bit out of scope for the
current issue at hand.
I have been thinking that we should simply have two separate service
implementations for offset committing and record fetching. If that happens,
then neither composition or inheritance is required; offset committing and
record fetching simply lives as two separate services.
What do you think?
> FlinkKafkaConsumerBaseTest has invalid mocks on final methods
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-8306
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8306
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Kafka Connector, Tests
> Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> Assignee: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.5.0, 1.4.1
>
>
> The {{FlinkKafkaConsumerBaseTest}} has invalid mocks on a final
> {{AbstractFetcher::commitInternalOffsetsToKafka(...)}} method. While an easy
> fix would be to simply make that method non-final, that is not ideal since it
> would be best that the method is left final to prevent overrides in
> subclasses.
> This suggests that offset committing functionality is too tightly coupled
> with the {{AbstractFetcher}}, making it hard to perform concise tests to
> verify offset committing.
> I suggest that we decouple record fetching and offset committing as separate
> services behind different interfaces. We should introduce a new interface,
> say {{KafkaOffsetCommitter}}, and test against that instead. Initially, we
> can simply let {{AbstractFetcher}} implement {{KafkaOffsetCommitter}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)