[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16340720#comment-16340720
]
Till Rohrmann commented on FLINK-8189:
--------------------------------------
Hi [~phoenixjiangnan], I agree with [~Zentol] that we should continue the
discussion in FLINK-4602. There it was actually stated that it might be
problematic to bundle RocksDB with {{flink-runtime}} because of licensing
concerns.
> move flink-statebackend-rocksdb out of flink-contrib
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-8189
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8189
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0
> Reporter: Bowen Li
> Assignee: Bowen Li
> Priority: Major
>
> Move {{flink-statebackend-rocksdb}} into probably its own/state-backend
> module or {{flink-runtime}} package.
> A few reasons:
> * RocksDB state backend has been evolving into the standard state backends
> because it can handle much larger state compared to HeapStateBackend. It
> would be better to put it into /lib package in Flink somehow by default
> * {{flink-contrib}} doesn't show the correct package hierarchy
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)