[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16346469#comment-16346469
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8523:
---------------------------------------

Github user zhijiangW commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5381#discussion_r164988630
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/network/partition/consumer/SingleInputGate.java
 ---
    @@ -315,6 +322,7 @@ public void returnExclusiveSegments(List<MemorySegment> 
segments) throws IOExcep
        public void setInputChannel(IntermediateResultPartitionID partitionId, 
InputChannel inputChannel) {
                synchronized (requestLock) {
                        if (inputChannels.put(checkNotNull(partitionId), 
checkNotNull(inputChannel)) == null
    +                                   && 
indexToInputChannelMap.put(inputChannel.getChannelIndex(), inputChannel) == null
    --- End diff --
    
    alright.


> Stop assigning floating buffers for blocked input channels in exactly-once 
> mode
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-8523
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8523
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Network
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: zhijiang
>            Assignee: zhijiang
>            Priority: Major
>
> In exactly-once mode, the input channel is set blocked state when reading 
> barrier from it. And the blocked state will be released after barrier 
> alignment or cancelled.
>  
> In credit-based network flow control, we should avoid assigning floating 
> buffers for blocked input channels because the buffers after barrier will not 
> be processed by operator until alignment.
> To do so, we can fully make use of floating buffers and speed up barrier 
> alignment in some extent.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to