[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16365776#comment-16365776
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8360:
---------------------------------------
Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5239#discussion_r168514168
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/state/TaskLocalStateStore.java
---
@@ -166,20 +190,38 @@ public TaskStateSnapshot retrieveLocalState(long
checkpointID) {
* Disposes the state of all local snapshots managed by this object.
*/
public void dispose() {
+
+ Collection<Map.Entry<Long, TaskStateSnapshot>> statesCopy;
+
synchronized (lock) {
- for (Map.Entry<Long, TaskStateSnapshot> entry :
storedTaskStateByCheckpointID.entrySet()) {
- discardStateObject(entry.getValue(),
entry.getKey());
- }
discarded = true;
+ statesCopy = new
ArrayList<>(storedTaskStateByCheckpointID.entrySet());
}
+
+ discardExecutor.execute(() -> {
--- End diff --
I think it would be good for these kind of asynchronous clean up operations
to return a `CompletableFuture`. This future could then be returned by the
`dispose` method. The benefit would be that the caller would know when the
clean up has completed and, thus, would be safe to shut down the
`discardExecutor`.
> Implement task-local state recovery
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-8360
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8360
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
> Reporter: Stefan Richter
> Assignee: Stefan Richter
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> This issue tracks the development of recovery from task-local state. The main
> idea is to have a secondary, local copy of the checkpointed state, while
> there is still a primary copy in DFS that we report to the checkpoint
> coordinator.
> Recovery can attempt to restore from the secondary local copy, if available,
> to save network bandwidth. This requires that the assignment from tasks to
> slots is as sticky is possible.
> For starters, we will implement this feature for all managed keyed states and
> can easily enhance it to all other state types (e.g. operator state) later.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)