Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/871#discussion_r34142416
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/pipeline/Predictor.scala
---
@@ -72,12 +74,36 @@ trait Predictor[Self] extends Estimator[Self] with
WithParameters {
*/
def evaluate[Testing, PredictionValue](
testing: DataSet[Testing],
- evaluateParameters: ParameterMap = ParameterMap.Empty)(implicit
- evaluator: EvaluateDataSetOperation[Self, Testing, PredictionValue])
+ evaluateParameters: ParameterMap = ParameterMap.Empty)
+ (implicit evaluator: EvaluateDataSetOperation[Self, Testing,
PredictionValue])
: DataSet[(PredictionValue, PredictionValue)] = {
FlinkMLTools.registerFlinkMLTypes(testing.getExecutionEnvironment)
evaluator.evaluateDataSet(this, evaluateParameters, testing)
}
+
+ /** Calculates a numerical score for the [[Predictor]]
+ *
+ * By convention, higher scores are considered better, so even if a
loss is used as a performance
+ * measure, it will be negated, so that that higher is better.
+ * @param testing The evaluation DataSet, that contains the features
and the true value
+ * @param evaluateOperation An EvaluateDataSetOperation that produces
Double results
+ * @tparam Testing The type of the features and true value, for example
[[LabeledVector]]
+ * @return A DataSet containing one Double that indicates the score of
the predictor
+ */
+ def score[Testing](testing: DataSet[Testing])
--- End diff --
Hmm but why not simply using a `Scorer` object?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
