[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16372803#comment-16372803
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8735:
---------------------------------------

Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5552
  
    @kl0u thanks for the review! I saw that the Scala ITCase is very different 
from the Java one. I (or someone) should probably tackle that in a follow-up. 
WDYT?


> Add savepoint migration ITCase that covers operator state
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-8735
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8735
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Tests
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Aljoscha Krettek
>            Assignee: Aljoscha Krettek
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.5.0, 1.4.2
>
>
> The current {{StatefulJobSavepointMigrationITCase}} does not cover operator 
> state, meaning state accessed using {{OperatorStateStore}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to