[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16372803#comment-16372803
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8735:
---------------------------------------
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5552
@kl0u thanks for the review! I saw that the Scala ITCase is very different
from the Java one. I (or someone) should probably tackle that in a follow-up.
WDYT?
> Add savepoint migration ITCase that covers operator state
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-8735
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8735
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Tests
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.5.0
> Reporter: Aljoscha Krettek
> Assignee: Aljoscha Krettek
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.5.0, 1.4.2
>
>
> The current {{StatefulJobSavepointMigrationITCase}} does not cover operator
> state, meaning state accessed using {{OperatorStateStore}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
