[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16406615#comment-16406615
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8910:
---------------------------------------
Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5676#discussion_r175832543
--- Diff:
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/TaskInfo.java ---
@@ -107,4 +131,12 @@ public int getAttemptNumber() {
public String getTaskNameWithSubtasks() {
return this.taskNameWithSubtasks;
}
+
+ /**
+ * Returns the allocation id for where this task is executed.
+ * @return the allocation id for where this task is executed.
+ */
+ public String getAllocationID() {
--- End diff --
I'm also not sure whether we want to expose location information to the
`Task`. Given scheduling transparency, this feels a bit wrong. Isn't there a
different way to check whether a task was recovered locally?
> Introduce automated end-to-end test for local recovery (including sticky
> scheduling)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-8910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8910
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0
> Reporter: Stefan Richter
> Assignee: Stefan Richter
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> We should have an automated end-to-end test that can run nightly to check
> that sticky allocation and local recovery work as expected.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
