[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16409999#comment-16409999
]
Ken Krugler commented on FLINK-9058:
------------------------------------
Would it make sense to file a related enhancement issue, for the
{{ListCheckpointed}} methods to take/return iterables to avoid wasteful memory
allocations, for the case where the state isn't also an in-memory list?
> Relax ListState.addAll() and ListState.update() to take Iterable
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-9058
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9058
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
> Reporter: Aljoscha Krettek
> Assignee: Aljoscha Krettek
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> [~srichter] What do you think about this. None of the implementations require
> the parameter to actually be a list and allowing an {{Iterable}} there allows
> calling it in situations where all you have is an {{Iterable}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
