[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16444230#comment-16444230
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8689:
---------------------------------------

Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5555#discussion_r182773359
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/codegen/AggregationCodeGenerator.scala
 ---
    @@ -417,13 +530,26 @@ class AggregationCodeGenerator(
             .stripMargin
           val create: String = {
             for (i <- aggs.indices) yield {
    -          j"""
    -             |    ${accTypes(i)} acc$i = (${accTypes(i)}) 
${aggs(i)}.createAccumulator();
    -             |    ${genDataViewFieldSetter(s"acc$i", i)}
    -             |    accs.setField(
    -             |      $i,
    -             |      acc$i);"""
    -            .stripMargin
    +          if (isDistinctAggs(i)) {
    +            j"""
    +               |    ${accTypes(i)} acc$i = (${accTypes(i)}) 
${aggs(i)}.createAccumulator();
    +               |    $distinctAccType distinctAcc$i = ($distinctAccType) 
new org.apache.flink.table.
    +               |        functions.aggfunctions.DistinctAccumulator(acc$i);
    +               |    ${genDistinctDataViewFieldSetter(s"distinctAcc$i", i)}
    --- End diff --
    
    I think this and the `genAccDataViewFieldSetter` call (both from here and 
the non-distinct case) can be removed.


> Add runtime support of distinct filter using MapView 
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-8689
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8689
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Rong Rong
>            Assignee: Rong Rong
>            Priority: Major
>
> This ticket should cover distinct aggregate function support to codegen for 
> *AggregateCall*, where *isDistinct* fields is set to true.
> This can be verified using the following SQL, which is not currently 
> producing correct results.
> {code:java}
> SELECT
>   a,
>   SUM(b) OVER (PARTITION BY a ORDER BY proctime ROWS BETWEEN 5 PRECEDING AND 
> CURRENT ROW)
> FROM
>   MyTable{code}
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to