GitHub user makeyang opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5908

    [FLINK-9182]async checkpoints for timer service

    ## What is the purpose of the change
    This PR is WIP, and is need finish unit tests which are marked as TODO.
    It is opened to collect feedback for a proposed solution for FLINK-9182
    
    ## Brief change log
    1. add one more state called rawkeyedstatemeta, which is help to store 
verion info of timerservice and tierm size
    2. make timer state snapshot async
    
    ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
        Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / (**no**)
        The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
@Public(Evolving): (yes / **no**)
        The serializers: (yes / **no** / don't know)
        The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / 
**no** / don't know)
        Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (**yes** / no / don't know)
        The S3 file system connector: (yes / **no** / don't know)
    
    ## Documentation
        Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / **no**)
        If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / 
JavaDocs / not documented)
    
    


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/makeyang/flink FLINK-9182

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5908.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #5908
    
----
commit 7eca3bebd2b92ffb53a2058d10df966ffd3d4875
Author: makeyang <makeyang@...>
Date:   2018-04-25T09:24:26Z

    [FLINK-9182]async checkpoints for timer service
    there are some unit tests still need to fix which I marked as TODO.
    the package has passed the integration test on my test env so please take a 
look at the code to verified the init thoughts first

----


---

Reply via email to