[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Aljoscha Krettek updated FLINK-5763:
------------------------------------
    Priority: Critical  (was: Blocker)

> Make savepoints self-contained and relocatable
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-5763
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5763
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
>            Reporter: Ufuk Celebi
>            Priority: Critical
>
> After a user has triggered a savepoint, a single savepoint file will be 
> returned as a handle to the savepoint. A savepoint to {{<target>}} creates a 
> savepoint file like {{<target>/savepoint-<randomSuffix>}}.
> This file contains the metadata of the corresponding checkpoint, but not the 
> actual program state. While this works well for short term management 
> (pause-and-resume a job), it makes it hard to manage savepoints over longer 
> periods of time.
> h4. Problems
> h5. Scattered Checkpoint Files
> For file system based checkpoints (FsStateBackend, RocksDBStateBackend) this 
> results in the savepoint referencing files from the checkpoint directory 
> (usually different than <target>). For users, it is virtually impossible to 
> tell which checkpoint files belong to a savepoint and which are lingering 
> around. This can easily lead to accidentally invalidating a savepoint by 
> deleting checkpoint files.
> h5. Savepoints Not Relocatable
> Even if a user is able to figure out which checkpoint files belong to a 
> savepoint, moving these files will invalidate the savepoint as well, because 
> the metadata file references absolute file paths.
> h5. Forced to Use CLI for Disposal
> Because of the scattered files, the user is in practice forced to use Flink’s 
> CLI to dispose a savepoint. This should be possible to handle in the scope of 
> the user’s environment via a file system delete operation.
> h4. Proposal
> In order to solve the described problems, savepoints should contain all their 
> state, both metadata and program state, inside a single directory. 
> Furthermore the metadata must only hold relative references to the checkpoint 
> files. This makes it obvious which files make up the state of a savepoint and 
> it is possible to move savepoints around by moving the savepoint directory.
> h5. Desired File Layout
> Triggering a savepoint to {{<target>}} creates a directory as follows:
> {code}
> <target>/savepoint-<jobId>-<randomSuffix>
>   +-- _metadata
>   +-- data-<randomSuffix> [1 or more]
> {code}
> We include the JobID in the savepoint directory name in order to give some 
> hints about which job a savepoint belongs to.
> h5. CLI
> - Trigger: When triggering a savepoint to {{<target>}} the savepoint 
> directory will be returned as the handle to the savepoint.
> - Restore: Users can restore by pointing to the directory or the _metadata 
> file. The data files should be required to be in the same directory as the 
> _metadata file.
> - Dispose: The disposal command should be deprecated and eventually removed. 
> While deprecated, disposal can happen by specifying the directory or the 
> _metadata file (same as restore).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to