Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/847#issuecomment-123402206
I see your point @shghatge.
However, I think naming just one method differently will be confusing..
If we're going to have custom method names, let's go with @andralungu's
suggestion above and make sure we document these properly.
I would prefer a bit shorter method names though.
How about:
1). `keyType(K)`
2). `vertexTypes(K, VV)`
3). `edgeTypes(K, EV)`
4). `types(K, VV, EV)`
?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
