[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16544554#comment-16544554
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9794:
---------------------------------------
Github user jrthe42 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6301
Hi @hequn8128, I agree with you that a connection pool is more effective
using connection resource. I didn't choose connection pool because that will
introduce new dependencies, and I'm not sure if that tradeoff is acceptable. I
will check ```MiniConnectionPoolManager ``` to see if it's a better way.
> JDBCOutputFormat does not consider idle connection and multithreads
> synchronization
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-9794
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9794
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Streaming Connectors
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.5.0
> Reporter: wangsan
> Assignee: wangsan
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Current implementation of JDBCOutputFormat has two potential problems:
> 1. The Connection was established when JDBCOutputFormat is opened, and will
> be used all the time. But if this connection lies idle for a long time, the
> database will force close the connection, thus errors may occur.
> 2. The flush() method is called when batchCount exceeds the threshold, but it
> is also called while snapshotting state. So two threads may modify upload and
> batchCount, but without synchronization.
> We need fix these two problems to make JDBCOutputFormat more reliable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
