[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16555238#comment-16555238
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9897:
---------------------------------------
Github user tzulitai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6408#discussion_r204999405
--- Diff:
flink-connectors/flink-connector-kinesis/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kinesis/internals/ShardConsumer.java
---
@@ -233,26 +225,69 @@ public void run() {
subscribedShard.getShard().getHashKeyRange().getEndingHashKey());
long recordBatchSizeBytes = 0L;
- long averageRecordSizeBytes = 0L;
-
for (UserRecord record :
fetchedRecords) {
recordBatchSizeBytes +=
record.getData().remaining();
deserializeRecordForCollectionAndUpdateState(record);
}
- if (useAdaptiveReads &&
!fetchedRecords.isEmpty()) {
- averageRecordSizeBytes =
recordBatchSizeBytes / fetchedRecords.size();
- maxNumberOfRecordsPerFetch =
getAdaptiveMaxRecordsPerFetch(averageRecordSizeBytes);
- }
-
nextShardItr =
getRecordsResult.getNextShardIterator();
+
+ long processingEndTimeNanos =
System.nanoTime();
--- End diff --
having a local variable here seems a bit redundant, since we always adjust
it right afterwards.
> Further enhance adaptive reads in Kinesis Connector to depend on run loop time
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-9897
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9897
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Kinesis Connector
> Affects Versions: 1.4.2, 1.5.1
> Reporter: Lakshmi Rao
> Assignee: Lakshmi Rao
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> In FLINK-9692, we introduced the ability for the shardConsumer to adaptively
> read more records based on the current average record size to optimize the 2
> Mb/sec shard limit. The feature maximizes maxNumberOfRecordsPerFetch of 5
> reads/sec (as prescribed by Kinesis limits). In the case where applications
> take more time to process records in the run loop, they are no longer able to
> read at a frequency of 5 reads/sec (even though their fetchIntervalMillis
> maybe set to 200 ms). In such a scenario, the maxNumberOfRecordsPerFetch
> should be calculated based on the time that the run loop actually takes as
> opposed to fetchIntervalMillis.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
