[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16638496#comment-16638496
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10289:
----------------------------------------
StefanRRichter commented on issue #6739: [FLINK-10289] [JobManager] Classify
Exceptions to different category for apply different failover strategy
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6739#issuecomment-427087088
@isunjin I also like the general idea, but not so much the current
implementation. One disadvantage I see with the annotation is that they are not
propagated in inheritance hierarchies and you always need to remember adding
them in such a case. I also wonder where and how this classifier will be
invoked later. Maybe an alternative approach could be to have a fixed set of
`TaskException`s for the cases, and before leaving the TM, all exceptions are
wrapped as cause into their matching `TaskException` to classify them for the
JM's recovery approach. However, the "best" approach might also depend on the
intended use, which is not clear for me from the PR and that is why I am asking.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Classify Exceptions to different category for apply different failover
> strategy
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-10289
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10289
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: JobManager
> Reporter: JIN SUN
> Assignee: JIN SUN
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> We need to classify exceptions and treat them with different strategies. To
> do this, we propose to introduce the following Throwable Types, and the
> corresponding exceptions:
> * NonRecoverable
> ** We shouldn’t retry if an exception was classified as NonRecoverable
> ** For example, NoResouceAvailiableException is a NonRecoverable Exception
> ** Introduce a new Exception UserCodeException to wrap all exceptions that
> throw from user code
> * PartitionDataMissingError
> ** In certain scenarios producer data was transferred in blocking mode or
> data was saved in persistent store. If the partition was missing, we need to
> revoke/rerun the produce task to regenerate the data.
> ** Introduce a new exception PartitionDataMissingException to wrap all those
> kinds of issues.
> * EnvironmentError
> ** It happened due to hardware, or software issues that were related to
> specific environments. The assumption is that a task will succeed if we run
> it in a different environment, and other task run in this bad environment
> will very likely fail. If multiple task failures in the same machine due to
> EnvironmentError, we need to consider adding the bad machine to blacklist,
> and avoiding schedule task on it.
> ** Introduce a new exception EnvironmentException to wrap all those kind of
> issues.
> * Recoverable
> ** We assume other issues are recoverable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)