[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16643385#comment-16643385
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10399:
----------------------------------------
GJL commented on a change in pull request #6737: [FLINK-10399] Refactor
ParameterTool#fromArgs
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6737#discussion_r223690006
##########
File path:
flink-java/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/utils/AbstractParameterToolTest.java
##########
@@ -52,30 +52,29 @@ protected void validate(ParameterTool parameter) {
} catch (Exception e) {
fail();
Review comment:
The test will fail if an exception is thrown. I will propagate the exception
in a separate commit.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Refactor ParameterTool#fromArgs
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-10399
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10399
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 1.7.0
> Reporter: TisonKun
> Assignee: TisonKun
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> {{ParameterTool#fromArgs}} uses a weird implement which flink developer would
> fail to parse it fast.
> The main problem is that, when parse args, we always try to get a key-value
> pair, but the implement iterate by a {{for}} loop, thus introduce weird
> flag/mutable variable and branches.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
