[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16648928#comment-16648928
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10527:
----------------------------------------

yanghua commented on issue #6816: [FLINK-10527] Cleanup constant isNewMode in 
YarnTestBase
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6816#issuecomment-429539752
 
 
   @tillrohrmann For test case `testTaskManagerFailure`, the current test mode 
(based on stdout and stderr's special print message) cannot verify the Flip-6 
scene. Because it doesn't pre-start a TM, so I can only commit a job to drive 
the TM registration, but this will cause the Job's output to flush out the 
flink's output, which shares stdout and stderr. Therefore, many judgments will 
not take effect.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> Cleanup constant isNewMode in YarnTestBase
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10527
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10527
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: YARN
>            Reporter: vinoyang
>            Assignee: vinoyang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> This seems to be a residual problem with FLINK-10396. It is set to true in 
> that PR. Currently it has three usage scenarios:
> 1. assert, caused an error
> {code:java}
> assumeTrue("The new mode does not start TMs upfront.", !isNewMode);
> {code}
> 2. if (!isNewMode) the logic in the block would not have invoked, the if 
> block can be removed
> 3. if (isNewMode) always been invoked, the if statement can be removed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to