[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16663339#comment-16663339
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10621:
----------------------------------------

zentol closed pull request #6925: [FLINK-10621][runtime] Fix unstable unit test 
case of BootstrapToolsTest
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6925
 
 
   

This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:

As this is a foreign pull request (from a fork), the diff is supplied
below (as it won't show otherwise due to GitHub magic):

diff --git 
a/flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/clusterframework/BootstrapToolsTest.java
 
b/flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/clusterframework/BootstrapToolsTest.java
index c01f1aa19fe..805e97036bc 100644
--- 
a/flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/clusterframework/BootstrapToolsTest.java
+++ 
b/flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/clusterframework/BootstrapToolsTest.java
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ public void testConcurrentActorSystemCreation() throws 
Exception {
                                                                        
"localhost",
                                                                        "0",
                                                                        LOG);
-                                                       })))
+                                                       }), executorService))
                                .map(
                                        // terminate ActorSystems
                                        actorSystemFuture ->


 

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> BootstrapToolsTest.testConcurrentActorSystemCreation hangs forever when 
> running locally
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10621
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10621
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: OS X, 4 cores, Java 1.8.0_181
>            Reporter: Alexey Trenikhin
>            Assignee: Biao Liu
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: threaddump-1540049768201.tdump
>
>
> When running locally 
> BootstrapToolsTest.testConcurrentActorSystemCreation(BootstrapToolsTest.java:358)
>  hangs forever (waited for 20 minutes, multiple attempts)
> {noformat}
> "main" #1 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007facaa801000 nid=0x1703 waiting on 
> condition [0x0000700000218000]
>    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>         at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>         - parking to wait for  <0x000000074fee2370> (a 
> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Signaller)
>         at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Signaller.block(CompletableFuture.java:1693)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.managedBlock(ForkJoinPool.java:3323)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.waitingGet(CompletableFuture.java:1729)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.get(CompletableFuture.java:1895)
>         at 
> org.apache.flink.runtime.clusterframework.BootstrapToolsTest.testConcurrentActorSystemCreation(BootstrapToolsTest.java:358)
>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>         at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>         at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>         at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
>         at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>         at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
>         at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>         at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
>         at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
>         at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
>         at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>    Locked ownable synchronizers:
>         - None
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to