[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16684825#comment-16684825
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10820:
----------------------------------------
zhijiangW commented on a change in pull request #7051: [FLINK-10820][network]
Simplify the RebalancePartitioner implementation
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7051#discussion_r232926075
##########
File path:
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/partitioner/RebalancePartitioner.java
##########
@@ -33,29 +33,18 @@
public class RebalancePartitioner<T> extends StreamPartitioner<T> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
- private final int[] returnArray = {Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1};
+ private final int[] returnArray = { -1 };
Review comment:
Yes, I also considered to use a boolean `isInitialized` before as you said.
In order not to bring another extra variable, I relies on `-1` directly. I
agree another boolean value seems more cleaner than current way.
You are right that the current `ChannelSelector` is short of mechanism to
initialization, and it may be necessary to add this logic in the interface. I
will double check how many implementations are needing this logic or just
`RebalancePartitioner`, especially for the batch implementations in
`OutputEmitter`. Then I would consider whether to cover this refactor in this
PR or in a separate PR next. :)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Simplify the RebalancePartitioner implementation
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-10820
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10820
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Network
> Affects Versions: 1.8.0
> Reporter: zhijiang
> Assignee: zhijiang
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> _The current {{RebalancePartitioner}} implementation seems a little hacky for
> selecting a random number as the first channel index, and the following
> selections based on this random index in round-robin fashion._
> _Especially for the corner case of {{numChannels = Integer.MAX_VALUE}}, it
> would trigger next random index once reaching the last channel index.
> Actually the random index should be selected only once at the first time._
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
