[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14706436#comment-14706436
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2536:
---------------------------------------
Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1030#discussion_r37618025
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/functions/sink/SocketClientSinkTest.java
---
@@ -125,4 +121,102 @@ public void testSocketSink() throws Exception{
assertEquals("Connected", this.access);
assertEquals("testSocketSinkInvoke", value);
}
+
+ public Thread t;
+
+ @Test
+ public void testSocketSinkNoRetry() throws Exception{
+ ServerSocket server = new ServerSocket(0);
+ port = server.getLocalPort();
+
+ new Thread(new Runnable() {
+
+ @Override
+ public void run() {
+ t = Thread.currentThread();
+ SerializationSchema<String, byte[]>
simpleSchema = new SerializationSchema<String, byte[]>() {
+ @Override
+ public byte[] serialize(String element)
{
+ return element.getBytes();
+ }
+ };
+
+ try {
+ SocketClientSink<String> simpleSink =
new SocketClientSink<String>(host, port, simpleSchema, 0);
+ simpleSink.open(new Configuration());
+ Thread.sleep(10000);
--- End diff --
To be honest, I'm not a big fan of `sleep` based synchronization. Too often
these kind of tests have failed on Travis. Usually if you use sleeps, the
interval is either to short to allow different interleavings if you have bad
luck or they are too long which makes the test slow. Therefore, I'd propose a
simple wait object on which you wait from within the thread. Once you've closed
the server socket, you can trigger the `notifyAll` method on this wait object
to let the thread continue.
> Add a retry for SocketClientSink
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-2536
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2536
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Streaming
> Affects Versions: 0.10
> Reporter: Huang Wei
> Fix For: 0.10
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> I found the SocketClientSink doesn`t use a re-connect when disconnect from
> the socket server or get exception.
> I`d like to add a re-connect like socket source for socket sink.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
