[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16707016#comment-16707016
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7599:
---------------------------------------
dawidwys commented on issue #7177: [FLINK-7599] [table] Support for aggregates
in MATCH_RECOGNIZE
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7177#issuecomment-443675670
Hi @dianfu, @twalthr . Thank you for your review. I've updated the PR
according to your comments.
There are still two main discussion points from @twalthr review:
1. Moving `PatternVariableFinder`, which also validates that there is only a
single pattern variable in an aggregation, to e.g. `DataStreamMatchRule`. The
main role of this class is to extract that single variable though. If I
performed the validation at an earlier stage, I would have to traverse the
expression with the same code in `MatchCodeGenerator` anyway, but I am ok with
it, if you think it is worth it.
2. Using `aggCall.toString` as a key for reusing code for aggregation for a
single variable that was used multiple times in an expression. I could not
think of better way to identify that it is the same expression. Do you have an
idea what could I use instead?
I would appreciate if you had another look.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Support aggregation functions in the define and measures clause of
> MatchRecognize
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-7599
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7599
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: CEP, Table API & SQL
> Reporter: Dian Fu
> Assignee: Dawid Wysakowicz
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.8.0
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)