[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16707180#comment-16707180
 ] 

Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-11020:
---------------------------------------

[~hequn8128], the query that [~twalthr] used in the description can be executed 
without a cross product. 
I think the question is not whether we should enable cross products (which is a 
valid question as well!) but whether we should enable join reordering to 
prevent cross products.

I don't think that should enable join reordering in general because reordering 
without cardinality estimates is gambling and we should keep the join order 
stable.
If we find a query that cannot be planned, we could try to optimize it with 
join ordering enabled or we raise a meaningful exception explaining the issue 
to the user.

I'm not sure what the best approach is, but silently enabling join reordering 
(without stats) is something that I'm not very comfortable with.




> Reorder joins only to eliminate cross joins 
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-11020
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11020
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>            Reporter: Timo Walther
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, we don't reorder join and rely on the order provided by the user. 
> This is fine for most of the cases, however, it limits the set of supported 
> SQL queries.
> Example:
> {code}
> val streamUtil: StreamTableTestUtil = streamTestUtil()
> streamUtil.addTable[(Int, String, Long)]("MyTable", 'a, 'b, 'c.rowtime, 
> 'proctime.proctime)
> streamUtil.addTable[(Int, String, Long)]("MyTable2", 'a, 'b, 'c.rowtime, 
> 'proctime.proctime)
> streamUtil.addTable[(Int, String, Long)]("MyTable3", 'a, 'b, 'c.rowtime, 
> 'proctime.proctime)
> val sqlQuery =
>       """
>         |SELECT t1.a, t3.b
>         |FROM MyTable3 t3, MyTable2 t2, MyTable t1
>         |WHERE t1.a = t3.a AND t1.a = t2.a
>         |""".stripMargin
> streamUtil.printSql(sqlQuery)
> {code}
> Given the current rule sets, this query produces a cross join which is not 
> supported and thus leads to:
> {code}
> org.apache.flink.table.api.TableException: Cannot generate a valid execution 
> plan for the given query: 
> LogicalProject(a=[$8], b=[$1])
>   LogicalFilter(condition=[AND(=($8, $0), =($8, $4))])
>     LogicalJoin(condition=[true], joinType=[inner])
>       LogicalJoin(condition=[true], joinType=[inner])
>         LogicalTableScan(table=[[_DataStreamTable_2]])
>         LogicalTableScan(table=[[_DataStreamTable_1]])
>       LogicalTableScan(table=[[_DataStreamTable_0]])
> This exception indicates that the query uses an unsupported SQL feature.
> Please check the documentation for the set of currently supported SQL 
> features.
> {code}
> Introducing {{JoinPushThroughJoinRule}} would help but should only be applied 
> if a cross join is the only alternative.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to