[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16708457#comment-16708457
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-11050:
----------------------------------------
fhueske commented on issue #7226: FLINK-11050 add lowerBound and upperBound for
optimizing RocksDBMapState's entries
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7226#issuecomment-444030473
Hi @Myracle, thanks for the PR. I think we should either support the new API
for all `MapState` implementations or declare the method as a best-effort
filter (which means we have to manually filter the returned entries).
What do you think about this @StefanRRichter?
Best, Fabian
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> When IntervalJoin, get left or right buffer's entries more quickly by
> assigning lowerBound
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-11050
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11050
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
> Affects Versions: 1.6.2, 1.7.0
> Reporter: Liu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: performance, pull-request-available
>
> When IntervalJoin, it is very slow to get left or right buffer's entries.
> Because we have to scan all buffer's values, including the deleted values
> which are out of time range. These deleted values's processing consumes too
> much time in RocksDB's level 0. Since lowerBound is known, it can be
> optimized by seek from the timestamp of lowerBound.
> Our usage is like below:
> {code:java}
> labelStream.keyBy(uuid).intervalJoin(adLogStream.keyBy(uuid))
> .between(Time.milliseconds(0), Time.milliseconds(600000))
> .process(new processFunction())
> .sink(kafkaProducer)
> {code}
> Our data is huge. The job always runs for an hour and is stuck by
> RocksDB's seek when get buffer's entries. We use rocksDB's data to simulate
> the problem RocksDB and find that it takes too much time in deleted values.
> So we decide to optimize it by assigning the lowerBound instead of global
> search.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
