[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16714430#comment-16714430
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-11077:
--------------------------------------
Should we close this issue in favor of the "checkpoint abort" messages?
> Make subtask aware of the timeout of checkpoint and abort the current ongoing
> asynccheckpoint
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-11077
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11077
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
> Affects Versions: 1.8.0
> Reporter: aitozi
> Assignee: aitozi
> Priority: Major
>
> Now checkpoint coordinator will cancel the checkpoint when checkpoint
> timeout. But the subtask will continue to execute the async part / sync part
> of the timeout checkpoint. When checkpoint state is large, it is a waste of
> bandwidth. So I think the AsyncCheckpointRunnable should be aware of the
> timeout checkpoint and interrupt them. What do you think [~StephanEwen]
> [~srichter]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
