[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16715194#comment-16715194
]
Yun Tang commented on FLINK-10724:
----------------------------------
[~yanghua] I think CheckpointSubsumed should not be counted as checkpoint
failure, which in my opinion, is more likely a part of procedure to complete
new checkpoint.
> Refactor failure handling in check point coordinator
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-10724
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10724
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
> Reporter: Andrey Zagrebin
> Assignee: vinoyang
> Priority: Major
>
> At the moment failure handling of asynchronously triggered checkpoint in
> check point coordinator happens in different places. We could organise it
> similar way as failure handling of synchronous triggering of checkpoint in
> *CheckpointTriggerResult* where we classify error cases. This will simplify
> e.g. integration of error counter for FLINK-4810.
> See also discussion here: [https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6567]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
