walterddr commented on a change in pull request #7263: [FLINK-11081] Support 
binding port range for REST server
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7263#discussion_r240877872
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/rest/RestServerEndpoint.java
 ##########
 @@ -181,14 +184,44 @@ protected void initChannel(SocketChannel ch) {
                                .channel(NioServerSocketChannel.class)
                                .childHandler(initializer);
 
-                       log.debug("Binding rest endpoint to {}:{}.", 
restBindAddress, restBindPort);
-                       final ChannelFuture channel;
-                       if (restBindAddress == null) {
-                               channel = bootstrap.bind(restBindPort);
-                       } else {
-                               channel = bootstrap.bind(restBindAddress, 
restBindPort);
+                       ChannelFuture channel;
+
+                       // parse port range definition and create port iterator
+                       Iterator<Integer> portsIterator;
+                       try {
+                               portsIterator = 
NetUtils.getPortRangeFromString(restBindPort);
+                       } catch (Exception e) {
+                               throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid 
port range definition: " + restBindPort);
+                       }
+
+                       int chosenPort = 0;
+                       while (portsIterator.hasNext()) {
+                               try {
+                                       chosenPort = portsIterator.next();
+                                       if (restBindAddress == null) {
+                                               channel = 
bootstrap.bind(chosenPort);
+                                       } else {
+                                               channel = 
bootstrap.bind(restBindAddress, chosenPort);
+                                       }
+                                       serverChannel = 
channel.syncUninterruptibly().channel();
+                                       break;
+                               } catch (Exception e) {
+                                       // we can continue to try if this 
contains a netty channel exception
+                                       Throwable cause = e.getCause();
+                                       if (!(cause instanceof 
org.jboss.netty.channel.ChannelException ||
+                                               cause instanceof 
java.net.BindException)) {
+                                               throw e;
 
 Review comment:
   you are right. yeah I think both place the comment is a bit misleading. My 
take from the comment is: "we can continue to retry the same port within this 
while loop" instead of the actual meaning: "we 'could allow' users to continue 
try when we throw an exception to the user"

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to