[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16732702#comment-16732702
]
jiwei edited comment on FLINK-11230 at 1/3/19 6:30 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------
[~hequn8128],I have changed EventTimeTrigger to ContinuousEventTimeTrigger.I
think it just changed the fire time. Through testing, we found that it's useful
to getting the correct __ result for a single stream.Why it changes the result
by using union all and sum?
was (Author: jiweiautohome):
[~hequn8128],I have changed EventTimeTrigger to ContinuousEventTimeTrigger.I
think it just changed the fire time. Through testing, we found that it's useful
to getting the correct __ result for a single stream.Why it's change the result
by using union all and sum?
> Sum of FlinkSql after two table union all.The value is too large.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-11230
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11230
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Affects Versions: 1.7.0
> Reporter: jiwei
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: test
> Attachments: image-2019-01-02-14-18-33-890.png,
> image-2019-01-02-14-18-43-710.png, screenshot-1.png
>
>
> SELECT k AS KEY, SUM(p) AS pv
> FROM (
> SELECT tumble_start(stime, INTERVAL '1' minute) AS k
> , COUNT(*) AS p
> FROM flink_test1
> GROUP BY tumble(stime, INTERVAL '1' minute)
> UNION ALL
> SELECT tumble_start(stime, INTERVAL '1' minute) AS k
> , COUNT(*) AS p
> FROM flink_test2
> GROUP BY tumble(stime, INTERVAL '1' minute)
> ) t
> GROUP BY k
> The Result of executing this sql is about 7000 per minute and keeping
> increasing.But the result is 60 per minute for per table.Is there an error in
> my SQL statement?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
