tzulitai opened a new pull request #7429:  [FLINK-11280] [rocksdb] Lazily 
create RocksDBSerializedCompositeKeyBuilder only after restore
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7429
 
 
   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   This PR fixes the failing test in master:
   
`StateBackendMigrationTestBase.testStateBackendRestoreSucceedsIfNewKeySerializerRequiresReconfiguration`.
   
   The test reconfigures the key serializer and verifies that the reconfigured 
version is used instead of the original one. The test fails because when 
writing keys in the `RocksDBKeyedStateBackend`, the 
`RocksDBSerializedCompositeKeyBuilder` was using the invalid, non-reconfigured 
key serializer.
   
   The culprit is that the composite key builder is created in the constructor 
of the `RocksDBKeyedStateBackend`. The creation of the builder requires 
providing a key serializer.
   
   This is problematic, because the key serializer may be reconfigured during 
the restore phase, therefore invalidating the key serializer used by the 
composite key builder.
   
   This commit resolves this by lazily creating the composite key builder only 
after the restore phase, which would be the point-in-time when we are certain 
the key serializer will no longer be changed and is final.
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   The previously failing test 
`StateBackendMigrationTestBase.testStateBackendRestoreSucceedsIfNewKeySerializerRequiresReconfiguration`
 should now pass.
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: no
     - The serializers: no
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: yes
     - The S3 file system connector: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to