[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16751102#comment-16751102
]
Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-11219:
------------------------------------------
MIrroring my comment from the flink-shaded issue/PR:
It doesn't make sense to bump jackson to share it with calcite.
This could only work if you can safely relocate jackson usages in calcite in
the first place, but that means we don't have to share flink-shaded-jackson. We
can just let calcite use it's own own (relocated) version.
You'd just end up with unnecessary coupling between Flink and Calcite along
with a more brittle build process (since the shading pattern in flink-table has
to match flink-shaded-jackson).
> Upgrade Jackson dependency to 2.9.6
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-11219
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11219
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Build System
> Reporter: xuqianjin
> Assignee: xuqianjin
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> 1. Upgrade Jackson version to 2.9.6
> Because the Jackson version supported by calcite1.18.0 has been upgraded to
> Jackson 2.9.6.
> 2. Need to upgrade flink jackson in the shaded version
> Because many flink dependency from the flink-shaded.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
