Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1046#issuecomment-135085374
Putting a nested "stormConf" into the configuration seems just wrong,
sorry. Such a specific hack in a generic utility cannot yield maintainable code.
Why is that needed in the first place? Why not have a dedicated
configuration object for storm?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
