[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16841524#comment-16841524
 ] 

Konstantin Knauf commented on FLINK-12381:
------------------------------------------

[~till.rohrmann] I am happy to take this. Let me summarize what based on the 
discussion, I think, we need to do:

1) To solve the issue at hand, we only need to make sure, that {{JobID}}s are 
per-default randomly generated in {{StandaloneJobClusterEntrypoint}}, instead 
of defaulting to {{0}}, when HA is disabled. Are we breaking any public API by 
this? As far as I know, no, and a note in the release docs suffices.

2) In the case of a Job Cluster with HA enabled my understanding is, that there 
could still be a conflict even with different 
{{high-availability.cluster-id}}s, because the {{cluster-id}} is not part of 
the checkpoint path (or is it?). It only prevents clashes in Zookeeper. So, if 
there are left over checkpoints (reatained checkpoint or job never reached 
terminal state) from a previous job with a different {{cluster-id}}, but same 
{{state.checkpoints.dir}} and same default {{JobID}} ({{0}}), there would still 
be an issue. Therefore, in this case we would like to inject the {{JobID}} 
instead of defaulting to {{0}}.




> W/o HA, upon a full restart, checkpointing crashes
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-12381
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12381
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Checkpointing, Runtime / Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.8.0
>         Environment: Same as FLINK-\{12379, 12377, 12376}
>            Reporter: Henrik
>            Priority: Major
>
> {code:java}
> Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileAlreadyExistsException: 
> 'gs://example_bucket/flink/checkpoints/00000000000000000000000000000000/chk-16/_metadata'
>  already exists
>     at 
> com.google.cloud.hadoop.fs.gcs.GoogleHadoopOutputStream.createChannel(GoogleHadoopOutputStream.java:85)
>     at 
> com.google.cloud.hadoop.fs.gcs.GoogleHadoopOutputStream.<init>(GoogleHadoopOutputStream.java:74)
>     at 
> com.google.cloud.hadoop.fs.gcs.GoogleHadoopFileSystemBase.create(GoogleHadoopFileSystemBase.java:797)
>     at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.create(FileSystem.java:929)
>     at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.create(FileSystem.java:910)
>     at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.create(FileSystem.java:807)
>     at 
> org.apache.flink.runtime.fs.hdfs.HadoopFileSystem.create(HadoopFileSystem.java:141)
>     at 
> org.apache.flink.runtime.fs.hdfs.HadoopFileSystem.create(HadoopFileSystem.java:37)
>     at 
> org.apache.flink.runtime.state.filesystem.FsCheckpointMetadataOutputStream.<init>(FsCheckpointMetadataOutputStream.java:65)
>     at 
> org.apache.flink.runtime.state.filesystem.FsCheckpointStorageLocation.createMetadataOutputStream(FsCheckpointStorageLocation.java:104)
>     at 
> org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.PendingCheckpoint.finalizeCheckpoint(PendingCheckpoint.java:259)
>     at 
> org.apache.flink.runtime.checkpoint.CheckpointCoordinator.completePendingCheckpoint(CheckpointCoordinator.java:829)
>     ... 8 more
> {code}
> Instead, it should either just overwrite the checkpoint or fail to start the 
> job completely. Partial and undefined failure is not what should happen.
>  
> Repro:
>  # Set up a single purpose job cluster (which could use much better docs btw!)
>  # Let it run with GCS checkpointing for a while with rocksdb/gs://example
>  # Kill it
>  # Start it



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to