[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16849920#comment-16849920
]
Till Rohrmann commented on FLINK-12621:
---------------------------------------
Before starting implementing a solution [~zjffdu], let's try to first agree
that we want to resolve this issue and how we want to solve it. I personally
don't see much harm in having the {{JobExecutor}} interface. It might not be
strictly necessary but why risking that we break things in the wake of
refactoring it w/o gaining much additional value.
> Use MiniCluster instead of JobExecutor
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-12621
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12621
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.8.0
> Reporter: Jeff Zhang
> Assignee: Jeff Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> JobExecutor is specifically used for local mode, I don't think we need to
> introduce new class/interface for local mode, we should use the existing
> MiniCluster.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
