JingsongLi commented on a change in pull request #8678: [FLINK-12708][table]
Introduce new source and sink interfaces to make Blink runner work
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/8678#discussion_r292725578
##########
File path:
flink-table/flink-table-planner-blink/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/plan/nodes/physical/batch/BatchExecSink.scala
##########
@@ -77,11 +78,12 @@ class BatchExecSink[T](
override protected def translateToPlanInternal(
tableEnv: BatchTableEnvironment): StreamTransformation[Any] = {
val resultTransformation = sink match {
- case batchTableSink: BatchTableSink[T] =>
+ case boundedTableSink: StreamTableSink[T] =>
+ // we can insert the bounded DataStream into a StreamTableSink
val transformation = translateToStreamTransformation(withChangeFlag =
false, tableEnv)
val boundedStream = new DataStream(tableEnv.streamEnv, transformation)
- batchTableSink.emitBoundedStream(
- boundedStream, tableEnv.getConfig,
tableEnv.streamEnv.getConfig).getTransformation
+ boundedTableSink.emitDataStream(boundedStream)
Review comment:
No,
If you implement a `RetractSink`(`Tuple<Boolean, Row>`), you want to reuse
it in Batch, There must a true `withChangeFlag` to let conversion to convert
`BaseRow` to `Tuple`, That's what `withChangeFlag` does. (Internal Blink batch
support RetractSink and UpsertSink)
If you don't want support RetractSink and UpsertSink now, please throw
exception when sink is RetractSink or UpsertSink.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
