[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16867498#comment-16867498
]
vinoyang commented on FLINK-12514:
----------------------------------
Hi [~pnowojski] , in the last few days [~srichter] as my mentor to review the
PR of FLINK-12364. Now it is been merged. Thanks for [~srichter]'s efforts!
In that PR, we discussed and agreed that we need a more reasonable mechanism of
counting for concurrent failed checkpoint ids. We need to consider the
checkpoint id sequence.
I sincerely invite you as my mentor about this issue. WDYT? cc [~till.rohrmann]
> Refactor the failure checkpoint counting mechanism with ordered checkpoint id
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-12514
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12514
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Runtime / Checkpointing
> Reporter: vinoyang
> Assignee: vinoyang
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently, the checkpoint failure manager uses a simple counting mechanism
> which does not tract checkpoint id sequence.
> However, a more graceful counting mechanism is based on ordered checkpoint id
> sequence.
> It should be refactored after the FLINK-12364 would been merged.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
