[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Piotr Nowojski closed FLINK-12816.
----------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

Copied from the [github's pull 
request|[https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/8708#issuecomment-505777251]:]

{noformat}
However this change brakes a savepoint restoration compatibility. As far as I 
know, there is some check somewhere, that ensures (for good reasons) that 
maxParallelism of the current job and of the savepoint from which we are 
restoring is the same.

I'm pretty sure that we can not fix this that simply as this PR wants to do it. 
It also brings me a question, whether this change is worth the effort. Could 
you explain what exactly are you trying to improve/solve here?
{noformat}

For now, I'm closing this ticket because of the above mentioned issue. Please 
feel free to re-open it if you [~julien1987] (or anyone else) will come up with 
good motivating example and a proposed solution for the savepoint compatibility 
issue.

> set maxParallelism to 1 when DataStreamSource is not isParallel
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-12816
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12816
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: API / DataStream
>    Affects Versions: 1.8.0
>            Reporter: XuPingyong
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Now when DataStreamSource is not parallel, only parallelism is set to 1, 
> maxParallelism should be also set to 1.
>  
> As when SingleOutputStreamOperator is not  parallel, it set not only 
> parallelism but also maxParallelism to 1



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to