xintongsong opened a new pull request #9106: [FLINK-13184][yarn] Support 
launching task executors with multi-thread on YARN.
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9106
 
 
   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   This pull request support starting new TaskExecutors with multi-thread in 
YarnResourceManager, so when starting a large amount of TaskExecutors it won't 
the block main thread on RM from responding to other RPC messages (TE 
registration, heartbeats, etc.).
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   - b2ed97d0e6dd506602888aacf6146238fbcdfd48: Introduce a config option for 
the max number of threads on RM used for starting new TaskExecutors. 
   - 06c7209af04f49ca69a263f57fc713f3b9c55c87: Introduce a thread pool in 
YarnResourceManager and start new TaskExecutors with multi-thread. 
   - 25fc95f30720209e19bd010cdd517ff5e3c685d8: Update relevant test cases to 
wait for threads starting new TaskExecutors to finish.
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
     - Updated YarnResourceManagerTest to verify that YarnResourceManager 
starts new TaskExecutors properly.
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: (no)
     - The serializers: (no)
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes)
     - The S3 file system connector: (no)
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable)
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to