zhijiangW opened a new pull request #9132: [FLINK-13245][network] Fix the bug 
of file resource leak while canceling partition request
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9132
 
 
   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   *On producer side the netty handler receives the `CancelPartitionRequest` 
for releasing the `ResultSubpartitionView` resource. In previous implementation 
we try to find the corresponding view via available queue in 
`PartitionRequestQueue`. But in reality the view is not always available to 
stay in this queue, then the view would never be released.*
   
   *Furthermore the release of `ResultPartition/ResultSubpartitions` is based 
on the reference counter in `ReleaseOnConsumptionResultPartition`, but while 
handling the `CancelPartitionRequest` in `PartitionRequestQueue`, the 
`ReleaseOnConsum#ptionResultPartition` is never notified of consumed 
subpartition. That means the reference counter would never decrease to 0 to 
trigger partition release, which would bring file resource leak in the case of 
`BoundedBlockingSubpartition`.*
       
   *In order to fix above two issues, the corresponding view is released via 
all reader queue instead, and then it would call 
`ReleaseOnConsumptionResultPartition#onConsumedSubpartition` meanwhile to solve 
this bug.*
   
   ## Brief change log
   
     - *Fix the logic in handling `CancelPartitionRequest` in 
`PartitionRequestQueue`*
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
     - *Added unit tests for verifying the partition and view are both released 
while receiving `CancelPartitionRequest` for the case of available/unavailable 
view.*
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / **no**)
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: (yes / **no**)
     - The serializers: (yes / **no** / don't know)
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / **no** 
/ don't know)
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes / **no** / don't know)
     - The S3 file system connector: (yes / **no** / don't know)
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / **no**)
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? (**not applicable** / docs / 
JavaDocs / not documented)

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to