[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16895878#comment-16895878
 ] 

Piotr Nowojski commented on FLINK-13384:
----------------------------------------

>From your two proposals, as a hotfix I think the first one (exposing 
>{{LegacySourceFunctionThread}} via some {{Task.getMainExecutionThread()}} or 
>sth like that) sounds better to me.

However this is not the first time that backpressure monitor has been broken. 
Also I think it's inherently broken with the current threading model, since it 
only detects if the task is backpressured when a record was produced from the 
main thread. That's not always true: processing time timers, 
{{AsyncWaitOperator}}, {{ContinousFileReaderOperator}}, custom sources that 
emit records from independent threads are all braking this assumption. Sometime 
ago I was proposing a more general fix for that: use output buffer usage 
metrics. If at least one output buffer is full, we assume there is a 
backpressure. However that would have been probably a bigger change.

> The back pressure monitoring does not work for StreamSources
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-13384
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13384
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Metrics, Runtime / Task
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Dawid Wysakowicz
>            Assignee: Gary Yao
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I think it is caused by: [FLINK-12483]. The reason is that the 
> {{BackPressureStatsTrackerImpl}} samples only the main thread. FLINK-12483 
> introduced a separate thread for executing the sources in the mailbox model. 
> It is similar to other old bug that concerned only Kafka source: [FLINK-3456]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to