gaoyunhaii opened a new pull request #9283: [FLINK-13487][tests] Fix unstable 
partition lifecycle tests by ensuring TM has registered to JM before submitting 
task
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9283
 
 
   <!--
   *Thank you very much for contributing to Apache Flink - we are happy that 
you want to help us improve Flink. To help the community review your 
contribution in the best possible way, please go through the checklist below, 
which will get the contribution into a shape in which it can be best reviewed.*
   
   *Please understand that we do not do this to make contributions to Flink a 
hassle. In order to uphold a high standard of quality for code contributions, 
while at the same time managing a large number of contributions, we need 
contributors to prepare the contributions well, and give reviewers enough 
contextual information for the review. Please also understand that 
contributions that do not follow this guide will take longer to review and thus 
typically be picked up with lower priority by the community.*
   
   ## Contribution Checklist
   
     - Make sure that the pull request corresponds to a [JIRA 
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/issues). Exceptions are 
made for typos in JavaDoc or documentation files, which need no JIRA issue.
     
     - Name the pull request in the form "[FLINK-XXXX] [component] Title of the 
pull request", where *FLINK-XXXX* should be replaced by the actual issue 
number. Skip *component* if you are unsure about which is the best component.
     Typo fixes that have no associated JIRA issue should be named following 
this pattern: `[hotfix] [docs] Fix typo in event time introduction` or 
`[hotfix] [javadocs] Expand JavaDoc for PuncuatedWatermarkGenerator`.
   
     - Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the 
pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
     
     - Make sure that the change passes the automated tests, i.e., `mvn clean 
verify` passes. You can set up Travis CI to do that following [this 
guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html#open-a-pull-request).
   
     - Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from 
multiple issues.
     
     - Each commit in the pull request has a meaningful commit message 
(including the JIRA id)
   
     - Once all items of the checklist are addressed, remove the above text and 
this checklist, leaving only the filled out template below.
   
   
   **(The sections below can be removed for hotfixes of typos)**
   -->
   
   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   This pull request targets at fixing the unstable cases in 
TaskExecutorPartitionLifecycleTest. As described in the corresponding 
[JIRA](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13487), the tests may submit 
task before TM has successfully registered to JM, which will cause the tests 
fail since the checking whether the corresponding job id exists in the 
TaskExecutor#jobManagerTables can not be passed.
   
   The above issue does not exist for the real cases. For real cases, JM will 
not submit tasks before TM has offered slots, and the successful slot offering 
ensures TM has registered to JM. To fix the tests, we also simulate this 
process by ensuring slot has been offered to JM before the task gets submitted.
   
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   1. b94855a7695c7a649a174820b8cf85bb38edbd6d fix the unstable tests by ensure 
TM has registered to JM before submitting task.
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change fixes tests and can be verified as follows:
     - Add Thread.sleep(2000) in RetryingRegistration#register, before 
`completionFuture.complete(Tuple2.of(gateway, success));` which is executed in 
the RPC executors. With this modification, the original tests will fail stably.
     - Add this PR, and above failure will be fixed.
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): **no**
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: **no**
     - The serializers: **no**
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): **no**
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: **no**
     - The S3 file system connector: **no**
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? **no**
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? **not applicable**
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to